Cabinet Office loses legal battle over Boris Johnson’s COVID WhatsApp messages | Politics News

The Cabinet Office has lost its bid to withhold Boris Johnson’s unredacted WhatsApp messages and notebooks from the COVID-19 Inquiry following a legal battle with its chair.

Baroness Hallett issued an order – known as a section 21 notice – for the government to release the former prime minister’s documents in May, but the government opposed it.

The Cabinet Office then took took the unusual step last month of bringing a judicial review against her order, arguing that some of the content was “unambiguously irrelevant”.

But in a judgement published on Thursday, the High Court ruled that the while “some irrelevant documents” may be included in the material requested, that “does not invalidate the notice or mean that the section 21 cannot be lawfully exercised”.

It dismissed the Cabinet Office’s claim for judicial review, but said but said the department could make a different application to Baroness Hallett.

Politics latest: ‘Let me finish’: Climate protesters interrupt Keir Starmer’s big speech on education

The government said it will “comply fully” with the High Court judgment.

A spokesperson said: “The inquiry is an important step to learn lessons from the pandemic and the government is cooperating in the spirit of candour and transparency.

“As this judgment acknowledges, our judicial review application was valid as it raised issues over the application of the Inquiries Act 2005 that have now been clarified.

“The court’s judgment is a sensible resolution and will mean that the inquiry chair is able to see the information she may deem relevant, but we can work together to have an arrangement that respects the privacy of individuals and ensures completely irrelevant information is returned and not retained.

“We will comply fully with this judgment and will now work with the Inquiry team on the practical arrangements.”

It is understood the government is in a position to move quickly to submit the information and is satisfied that it gives people comfort that personal, private information is not going to be held indefinitely or shared with the whole inquiry.

Labour’s Deputy Leader Angela Rayner branded the result a “humiliating defeat”.

“While the rest of the country battles the cost-of-living crisis, Rishi Sunak has been wasting time and taxpayers’, money on doomed legal battles to withhold evidence from the Covid Inquiry,” she said.

“After this latest humiliating defeat, the prime minister must accept the ruling and comply with the Inquiry’s requests for evidence in full.

Deborah Doyle, spokesperson for Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK, said the judicial review lodged by the government “was a desperate waste of time and money”.

“The inquiry needs to get to the facts if the country is to learn lessons that will save lives in the future,” she said. “That means it needs to be able to access all of the evidence, not just what the Cabinet Office wants it to see.

“A successful inquiry could save thousands of lives in the event of another pandemic, and it’s a disgrace that the Cabinet Office is trying to obstruct it. Any attempt to appeal this decision or hinder its work further would be utterly shameful.”

In their ruling, Lord Justice Dingemans and Mr Justice Garnham concluded that Baroness Hallett had “acted rationally” when making her order.

Addressing the concern that unrelated material could be seen by the inquiry, the two judges noted that the Cabinet Office could make an application arguing “that it is unreasonable to produce material which does not relate to a matter in question at the inquiry” – and that it would be for the chair to “rule on that application”.

The two judges also said the chairwoman of the inquiry would return documents she finds to be “obviously irrelevant”.

“If, on examination, the chair of the inquiry rules that the document relates to a matter in question at the inquiry, and the person who has the document accepts this, that will be an end of the matter.

“If the chair of the inquiry rules that the document does not relate to a matter in question at the inquiry, then the chair will not be entitled to retain the document, and it might be noted that it would be a waste of time and resources to do so.”

Throughout the process, Mr Johnson had backed the COVID inquiry’s attempts to see his unredacted messages, saying he “no objections” to the inquiry seeing his entire back catalogue of communications.

In June he decided to bypass the Cabinet Office by sending “all unredacted WhatsApps” directly to the COVID inquiry, saying he was “perfectly content” for the material to be inspected.

Read more:
Nicola Sturgeon admits there was ‘no plan’ to deal with the pandemic
Matt Hancock says UK approach to pandemic planning was ‘completely wrong’

The former prime minister said he would “like to do the same” with texts that are on an old mobile phone he stopped using due to security concerns in May 2021 – more than a year after the pandemic began.

He said he had asked the government for its help to turn on the device securely to hand over the material.

The COVID Inquiry heard its first public hearings on 13 June, when it opened with a film of testimonies from bereaved families.

A number of high-profile politicians – including former prime minister David Cameron, former chancellor George Osborne, former health secretary Matt Hancock and Scotland’s former first minister Nicola Sturgeon – have taken to the witness stand.