Sorting by

×

Judge Denies Kimora Lee’s Request to Strike Russell Simmons Fraud Claims in Explosive Lawsuit

Exclusive

kimora lee simmons russell harassment million stocks lawsuit
Source: Mega

A judge denied Kimora Lee Simmons-Leissner and husband Tim Leissner’s latest request to strike Russell Simmon’s fraud claims.

Jun. 7 2024, Published 8:05 p.m. ET

Kimora Lee Simmons-Leissner faced another blow this week in her court battle with ex Russell Simmons, who sued the fashion mogul and her husband, Tim Leissner, alleging they fraudulently sold shares of his stock to help Tim avoid prison time.

A filing this week obtained by RadarOnline.com revealed that an appeals court in Los Angeles denied Kimora and Tim’s latest request to strike the fraud claims. The couple argued the record exec’s case should be thrown out under California’s anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws, which protect Californians from predatory lawsuits that violate their rights to free speech.

Article continues below advertisement

kimora tim
Source: MEGA

Kimora’s husband, Tim, was convicted in Malaysian wealth fund 1MDB’s embezzlement scheme in 2018.

Tim and Kimora argued that Russell’s complaint included “mixed causes of action,” meaning his claims stemmed from both protected and unprotected activity. Their argument pertained to letters written by Kimora and Tim — included in Russell’s complaint — regarding the transfer of the shares and Tim’s involvement in Malaysian wealth fund 1MDB’s corruption scandal.

The former Goldman Sachs investment banker pleaded guilty to federal foreign bribery and money laundering conspiracy charges in November 2018 and agreed to pay back $44 million dollars to avoid prison time.

Article continues below advertisement

kimora russell
Source: MEGA

Kimora and Russell were married from 1998 to 2009.

Article continues below advertisement

Russell, who was married to Kimora from 1998 to 2009, claimed that in May 2018, Kimora and Tim, “knowing full well that [Tim] would need tens of millions of dollars to avoid jail time, stay out on bail and forfeit monies for victim compensation,” allegedly unlawfully took four million shares of his stock in the energy drink company Celsius to pay Tim’s legal fees.

The Baby Phat founder filed the lawsuit in 2021, alleging that more than $200 million was disbursed to Tim and another alleged co-conspirator in the 1MDB scheme. His complaint included two letters purportedly penned by Kimora and Tim, which Russell claimed were part of a “cover-up” by the couple, who allegedly tried to “create a new spin for the conspiracy and fraud they had effectuated.”

MORE ON:

Russell Simmons

Article continues below advertisement

russell simmons demands lawsuit dismissed
Source: MEGA

The record exec filed the lawsuit against Kimora and Tim in 2021.

Article continues below advertisement

The letters — dated June 26, 2018, and February 5, 2020 — listed the transfer of the shares as temporary loans to cover Tim’s bond, authorized by Tim as a manager of Russell’s investment company, Nu Horizons. Russell, however, claimed the letters “do not reflect any legitimate loans but rather are further evidence of [Kimora and Tim’s] fraudulent scheme.”

Kimora and Tim filed separate motions to strike the complaint under various anti-SLAPP statutes, but both motions were denied in 2022 by a trial court.

Article continues below advertisement

Kimora Lee Simmons' Husband Posed As Former Wife For Years
Source: Mega

The couple argued that Russell’s complaint should be thrown out for violating California’s Anti-SLAPP laws.

Article continues below advertisement

The couple immediately appealed, but on Wednesday, June 5, Justice Maria Stratton moved to uphold the decision, calling the couple’s argument “a stretch.”

She wrote on behalf of the appellate court, “We disagree and find that the complaint alleges the two letters are merely incidental to and constitute evidence of the fraud claims. They are not the bases of the causes of action themselves. We affirm the trial court’s denial of both anti-SLAPP motions.”

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button