The extraordinary lengths Fulham went to kick a Newcastle fan out of the home end
Charlie thought little of it when he received an email from Fulham 14 hours after buying a general sale ticket for the visit of Newcastle United in September.
It was probably confirmation of his purchase, or a marketing email. But then he read the short message.
Following a recent post on social media and a review of your purchase history with the club, we have reason to believe that you are a visiting supporter.
Tickets purchased through Fulham FC are strictly for home supporters and your ticket purchase has been cancelled and refunded in full.
Charlie isnāt his real name ā when speaking to The i Paper about the story he is about to tell, he does not want his identity revealed or he will no longer be able to do what he has been doing for more than three decades.
For Charlie has a secret: he regularly attends Newcastle away games in the home seats. Look around you the next time your team hosts Newcastle United and Charlie might be there, keeping his head down and his eyes on the action, but not celebrating when your club scores, and stifling a cheer when his does.
He isnāt breaking the law, but it is a breach of the Premier Leagueās rules for away fans to buy home tickets, and after being banned by Fulham he does not wish other clubs to know his identity.
Charlie had bought tickets for himself and his daughter in the home seats to watch Newcastle travel to Craven Cottage in January for an FA Cup tie as well as other times before, and it had not ever been a problem.
Nor has it been an issue attending Newcastle games at Crystal Palace, Southampton, Aston Villa, Leicester City, Chelsea, Arsenal and Tottenham. āProbably a dozen clubs,ā he says after reeling them off. āBut there will be Newcastle fans who have been to more, and more frequently than me.
āYou just have to be respectful of people, you donāt have to rub someoneās nose in it when youāre standing in their section,ā he adds. āItās not an altogether enjoyable experience, to be in the home section.
āYou canāt be ridiculously jubilant and jump up and down and cheer. But if thatās the only chance you have to watch your team live you have to pay it.
āIām careful, behave myself, until I work out what the people around me are like and usually by half-time Iām chatting away to them, as I was at Fulham.ā
He had to remind his daughter to calm down when she celebrated the first of Newcastleās two goals in the FA Cup game. The only time he can recall himself facing even a smouldering of resentment was watching Newcastle at Selhurst Park in the 1994-95 season with a group of mates in the home stands. Palace supporters were anxious about the prospect of relegation (they went down that season) and when Peter Beardsley scored a āblindingā late winner he got a little over-excited.
āNo one threatened me but one of my mates said āfor godās sake shut upā,ā he recalls. āThat was 30 years ago. Iām now 65.ā
Charlie points out that it is now almost impossible to buy Newcastle away tickets ā and even home ones are hard to come by. In October, he went to St Jamesā Park for a Carabao Cup game but had to sit in the away end with Wimbledon supporters ā āI never thought Iād have to be in the away end at my own ground but thatās a consequence of the demand.ā
After season-ticket holders are catered for, the club run a ballot for remaining tickets, available only to members who must pay Ā£37 per season to be considered.
āThe club refuse to say how many tickets are available in the ballot, how many members there are, how many have been successful,ā he says. āYouāre asked to pay a fee to enter a competition where you donāt know any of the odds.
āI get that demand massively outstrips supply at St Jamesā Park. But we just want some transparency.
āThe club say itās commercially sensitive. Which it is: if as a fan you knew your chances of getting a ticket were probably worse than one in 100 you probably wouldnāt give the club Ā£37 for the season.ā
Charlie isnāt the only one to be caught out.
An 11-year-old Liverpool fan, his dad and two friends were turned away from Brighton & Hove Albionās Amex Stadium when Liverpool visited for a Carabao Cup tie at the end of October because the boy was wearing a Liverpool shirt and they had home tickets.
It was the boyās birthday and the ticket had been bought as a present. āIt wouldāve been his first live game,ā Adam, one of the group, told BBC 5Liveās 606 show. āWe got to the entrance and the steward looked at him and said, Thereās no way he can go in. Me and my mate thought he was joking.
āHe was wearing a Liverpool shirt ā I totally get that, I really do.
āWe put a jumper and a coat on him. The steward said: I know heās a Liverpool fan now. I said āmate heās 11, heās with three adultsā. Whereās the common sense?ā
They called the head steward and asked to change tickets for away seats but it was fully booked. As things got heated the boy became increasingly upset.
āHe had to go home, crying,ā Adam said. āThere just needs to be common sense with this rule. Itās got to be an age thing, post-16 or something. I was so disgusted with them.ā
Should a retired man in his sixties who is always respectful and understands the necessity not to antagonise be banned from buying tickets to support an away club in the home stands?
Should a young boy not be able to wear an away shirt sitting among home supporters? Surely nobody is going to attack a child at a football game, even if they do support the other team, are they?
That said, a cautionary note should be taken from when crowd trouble ignited in an FA Cup match in January between West Brom and Wolves ā during which some Wolves fans were spotted in the home stands ā and one mother later recalled how rival supporters charged towards her and her children.
It is a unique set of circumstances in menās football. Rugby union doesnāt segregate fans. In American sports, where the distances are so great between cities that there isnāt the same away-day culture, fans mix. When fans asked on Reddit whether an away supporter could buy tickets for the home seats for a Womenās Super League game, the resounding responses were that itās absolutely fine.
In menās football itās a grey area where confused logic meets legitimate safety concerns. There is a tangible edge and excitement created in English football stadiums by the them-and-us separation of two sets of supporters that would be lost if fans mixed freely.
Fulham accessing a ticket buyerās social media and tracing their purchase history to discover, in a Sherlock Holmes-esque process of logic and deduction, that they are, in fact, a Newcastle fan, shows the lengths clubs are going to prevent it.
āThereās an increasing problem of away fans finding their way into home areas,ā says Simon Duke, chair of the Fulham Supportersā Trust. āSpeaking to people at trusts at other clubs, this isnāt just a Fulham problem.
āIt can get unpleasant. If they behave, itās more acceptable. But when they are vocal, as some have been, and at times outright abusive, itās a powder keg waiting to ignite.
āThe Fulham Supportersā Trust concern is if the club canāt get a grip on this thereās going to be an incident one day, a bit like at West Brom v Wolves, thereās a big safety issue.ā
The FST raised the issue with club officials during a meeting in October after receiving a series of emails on the subject ā an increasing number following the Newcastle match.
John DāArcy, Fulhamās head of safety, said that some Newcastle fans in home seats had been ejected and that there were also issues when West Ham visited, according to the meeting notes.
Officials in the ticket office were able to find the seats in which offenders were sitting, but found many had moved to unsold seats. In other cases where they found Newcastle fans sitting in seats belonging to season-ticket holders, when the club contacted the season-ticket holder, they found that the tickets hadnāt been sold on, they were simply empty as they could not attend.
Fulham are looking at a more effective system for fans to report instances but āa balance has always to be struck between creating an even greater incident and the need to take actionā, the notes state.
It feels a touch sad that football is no longer a place where it is safe for children to wear opposition shirts sitting with home fans. But perhaps while it may appear to lack common sense it is a necessity.
āAll it will take is one major incident and everyone will be saying we wish we did something about it sooner,ā Duke says.
Meanwhile innocent bystanders will be collateral damage.
āIāve got almost no chance of getting a ticket at St Jamesā Park,ā Charlie says. āSince the new owners came in and started spending money and got people excited, away grounds are my best hope. If theyāre going to check ID and go through security measures that will extinguish it. Iāll just be an armchair fan.ā