Groups labelled extremist to be barred from Government contact and funding
Groups labelled as extremist under a new definition will be denied access to Government funding and prevented from meeting ministers and officials.
The definition, drawn up by Communities Secretary Michael Gove, comes into force on Thursday, and the Government is expected to publish a list of organisations covered by it in the coming weeks.
Groups on the list will only be able to appeal against their inclusion by launching a judicial review in the High Court.
Critics have said the move will âbreed division and encourage mistrustâ and threaten freedom of speech.
The Muslim Council of Britain said it was âundemocratic, divisive, and potentially illegalâ and âmay involve defining established Muslim organisations as extremistâ.
The new definition describes extremism as âthe promotion or advancement of an ideology based on violence, hatred or intoleranceâ that aims to ânegate or destroy the fundamental rights and freedoms of othersâ or âundermine, overturn or replace the UKâs system of liberal parliamentary democracy and democratic rightsâ.
It also includes those who âintentionally create a permissive environment for others to achieveâ either of those aims.
The previous definition, published in 2011, described extremism as âvocal or active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefâ as well as âcalls for the death of members of our armed forcesâ.
Mr Gove said the new definition would âensure that Government does not inadvertently provide a platform to those setting out to subvert democracy and deny other peopleâs fundamental rightsâ.
He added that it was the first in âa series of measures to tackle extremism and protect our democracyâ.
Labour said the new definition was ânot enoughâ and called for a full counter-extremism strategy and hate crime action plan to âturn words into action that will keep us safeâ.
Angela Rayner, the partyâs deputy leader and shadow communities secretary, said: âThis is a serious problem that needs serious action and tinkering with a new definition is not enough. The Governmentâs counter-extremism strategy is now nine years out of date, and theyâve repeatedly failed to define Islamophobia.
âAny suggestion that the Government has been engaging with groups that theyâve now decided are extremists raises serious questions over why it has taken so long to act.â
On Wednesday, the Archbishops of Canterbury and York issued a warning that the definition could âvilify the wrong people and risk yet more divisionâ instead of âproviding clarity or striking a conciliatory toneâ.
Conservative peer Baroness Warsi criticised the move, calling it a âdivide and rule approachâ intended to âbreed division and encourage mistrustâ.
Zara Mohammed, secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: âA broad cross-section of British society will see through the Governmentâs divisive extremism proposals.
âExtremism is a grave concern, and we all stand in opposition to it, despite the efforts of bigots to suggest otherwise through baseless accusations.â
She added: âWith elections looming, itâs unsurprising that the Government is resorting to this desperate tactic in the culture war.â
With agencies